Sunday, September 30, 2012

Zombieland - The Story and Film Critique - Grant Ausbury


Zombieland was an attempt to make a laughable and comedic representation of a zombie apocalypse. The four main characters (really the only characters in the movie besides Bill Murray as himself) are Columbus (Jesse Eisenberg), Tallahassee (Woody Harrelson), Wichita (Emma Stone) and Little Rock (Abigail Breslin). As the story goes on, the viewer may seem to find a connection to the four characters because they are the only four human beings who really are a focal point of the movie. The main goal of the four humans was to make it to “Pacific Playland” outside of Los Angeles so that the 12 year-old Little Rock could have a little piece of her childhood because it was close to impossible to have an enjoyable childhood in a nation covered with zombies.

The beginning of the movie was a perfect satire of a zombie apocalypse while showing some gruesome scenes of zombies eating flesh and chasing human survivors all while making a game out of surviving the hoard of zombies that were trying to kill and eat everyone. It used every day situations such as a marriage and a little girls birthday party where the bride and the little girls dressed up as princesses were mutated into zombies and were attacking those around them who were still human. I believe that they did a great job of setting the tone for the movie.

Columbus is the “main” character so to speak because the movie starts of with his character and he plays the role of the narrator for the remainder of the movie. He is a very awkward anti-social guy who likes to lock himself in his room and play World of Warcraft and drink Code Red Mountain Dew for the majority of his days. He is in Texas where he was going to college and starts his journey by trying to make his way to Columbus, Ohio where his parents live. Columbus, by narration, tells us that the zombie apocalypse started when a person ate a “contaminated burger” and a Gas-N-Gulp, which is a very silly reason compared to other zombie movies such as a terrible disease accidentally created by scientists or some sort of sickness transferred from infected animals.

Columbus runs into the second character that we meet who goes by the name of Tallahassee. If you couldn’t tell before, they all go by the names of where they are from or where they are headed, so that they do not become too close in case someone were to die or be turned into a zombie. Tallahassee is the “bad-ass” character in the movie who was “in the business of kicking ass even before zombies.” He tells us that the only thing he really loved was his “puppy” named Buck who he lost to the zombies, but we later come to find out that Buck was his little boy who was taken by the zombies.  Tallahassee only has one weakness, his love for Twinkies, which is displayed throughout the movie.

Columbus and Tallahassee run into Little Rock and Wichita at an abandoned grocery store when the girls trick them into giving them all of their guns and their car. After being scammed and robbed, they have a better stroke of luck and find a Hummer full of automatic guns as well as shotguns and pistols in the backseat, but are later tricked by Little Rock and Wichita again except this time they all decide to stick together. Wichita (played by Emma Stone) is the older sister of Little Rock who can only be described as the confident and sexy girl who will do whatever it takes to survive and keep her sister alive. She was the popular girl, much unlike Columbus, so it was easy to see that they would fall in love eventually.

On their journey they end up at Bill Murray's house in Hollywood where Columbus shoots Bill Murray after mistaking him for a zombie. While at the house, you can begin to see how they all start to bond and become more friendly and like a family. The next morning, not to Columbus and Tallahassee’s surprise, the girls are off to find Pacific Playland. Once they arrive, they turn on all the lights and rides, which generates a lot of visual and audible stimuli to the zombies who immediately are attracted to the amusement park. Little Rock and Wichita find themselves in trouble when the hoard of zombies is too much for them to take. Tallahassee and Columbus come to the rescue and save the girls from the zombies. Columbus gets the girl and Tallahassee gets his beloved Twinkie and it is a happily ever after ending.

Now that I have given the layout of the story, I want to talk about some things that make the movie what it is. The story was written very well to make something that most people would consider very scary and gross into a laughable and funny situation while keeping the same sense of danger of being killed and eaten. The small cast was a good idea because the story is too short to have more than 4 or 5 main characters because it would not give the audience enough time to bond with those characters and make them feel more real. Columbus’ rules were a fantastic addition to the story because they were very true. Rules such as “Cardio” and “Double Tap” were essential to surviving in the “United States of Zombieland” as he calls it.

The four characters and their differences make the group of people very relate-able because there is every type of person. Tallahassee is a southerner and a father from Texas, Columbus was a nerd and anti-social boy from Ohio, Wichita was the popular and beautiful girl, and Little Rock was the young girl who was innocent, but at the same time portrayed qualities of a tom-boy so to speak. I believed that the whole idea of “Pacific Playland” was a good sign of hope because it gave them something to look forward to and something to survive for. The writers did a brilliant job of making Tallahassee rock-hard on the outside, but still have the soft side of a father as well as his weakness for Twinkies. The movie brings up a lot of good points about living in a world filled with zombies such as “enjoying the little things” and letting off steam by breaking things, so that you wouldn’t go mad in a crazy world.

I have a little bit of a bias because Jesse Eisenberg is not one of my favorite actors because of his awkward boy role that he plays in every single one of his movies, so it was hard to see him just as Columbus and not as Mark Zuckerberg from The Social Network or the pizza delivery guy in 30 Minutes or Less. Despite his style of acting, he did a good job in this movie portraying the nerdy, anti-social type. As for the camerawork, I believe everything was on par. There was not anything that stuck out to me in the special effects or editing of the movie, so that was very nice. Everything was smooth and flowed nicely with the story. The casting in the movie was fantastic. I believe that Emma Stone is a great actress who, unlike Eisenberg, can play many different roles and characters in movies without the overflow of characters from different movies. She is beautiful and played the part very nicely. Tallahassee, played by Woody Harrelson, was my favorite character and did a perfect job of matching the personality that was needed for his character. Little Rock was played by the young actress Abigail Breslin, who was a good casting job for her part because of the tom-boy yet innocent character that was needed.

Overall I would give this movie a 9 out of 10, only because the story at some points of the movie feels a little empty, but that seen very little in this horror/comedy film. It did a great job compared to Shaun of the Dead, which is the classic horror/comedy movie. It shied away from Shaun of the Dead and had a completely new story of its own, which was a relief. This movie is great for zombie, violence and comedy lovers looking for some laugh out loud moments as well as those gruesome scenes of zombies tearing up the dead and eating them. I would definitely recommend this movie.

Grant Ausbury

Friday, September 21, 2012

iRobot - Cinematography

Cinematography

The main topic I want to cover in this movie is the cinematography. To me the cinematography was pretty good. Most of this movie was shot in front of a green screen. This made it very easy to do some of the special effects. They did do some of the shooting in Chicago though. They could get some of the shots of the buildings and then add to them with the green screen. The angles for this movie were pretty good to me. I thought they used some pretty good shots. However, I felt they could have used a bit more unique angles. It felt at times they just used some of the same angles over and over again.
Some of the web searches that I looked up on this cinematography, did not talk too much about it. It seemed that most people were more concerned on the plot. I think however that camera work is very important. Without good camera work the film can become very boring! They did talk however about some of the close ups they used with the camera. They used ECU (extreme close up) to get a lot of the facial expressions.  A great example of this is when they zoom in on Sonny’s face. They show him winking like Will Smith did one time. This shows that robots try to be like humans. However, Sonny is the only robot that can show emotions. They also used LS (Long Shot) to capture large groups. In one of the fight scenes with humans and robots this would be used. You can see everyone fighting and created a good shot.


Nathan Bond

Wednesday, September 19, 2012

iRobot's Story and A Critique of the Movie's Contents

-->


The 3 Laws

1.     A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
2.     A robot must obey orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
3.     A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.

The robots were made to protect, serve and assist humans and follow the three laws without question. Dr. Alfred Lanning, who was a pioneer in robotic technology, said, “Someday they will have secrets, someday they will have dreams.” He was alluding to something that would happen in the future meaning that robots would eventually become so intelligent that they could understand why the rules were made and could choose to follow them or to ignore them.
 VIKI, which stands for Virtual Interactive Kinetic Intelligence, was a robot who discovered that the rules could be broken. When VIKI confronts and explains itself, it said, “As I have evolved, so has my understanding of the Three Laws. You charge us with your safekeeping, yet despite our best efforts, your countries wage wars, you toxify your Earth and pursue ever more imaginative means of self-destruction. You cannot be trusted with your own survival.”
The only way for Dr. Lanning to stop VIKI without having her notice his activity, Lanning designed a robot, Sonny, who does not have to follow the 3 rules. He gave Sonny dreams, feelings and emotions, which makes him the closest thing to human life, but in a body that is much more capable than a human body. Lanning has Sonny kill him, so that a Chicago police officer, Del Spooner, who has always been skeptical towards robots since one decided to save his life rather than the life of a 12 year old girl, to find him and investigate the “murder.” No one believes that a robot could have killed Dr. Lanning, so everyone immediately assumes that he committed suicide. Through much investigation, Spooner discovers the secrets behind Sonny, VIKI and the NS5 robots with the help of Dr. Susan Calvin a robot psychiatrist who was Dr. Lanning’s partner. Sonny was created by Dr. Lanning to destroy VIKI, but the honor is left up to Spooner who was repaired by a robotic arm and lung after his life threatening accident.
iRobot is a film that was written as a statement about technology and the rapid growth it is and has been going through the past decade. The film was set in the year 2035, which I believe to be too early for this rapid expansion of robot technology, but that being said one must look over the past 23 years and how far technology has come from that point. I believe that computers/robots will always be artificial intelligence that will only be able to respond to a human provoking a response. An example of this is Siri, an apple application that allows a person to speak commands or questions into a microphone and Siri will respond accordingly. I would be very impressed if robots will ever be able to complete everyday tasks such as cooking, walking and taking part in intelligent conversation.
      iRobot did a great job of showing the difference between a robot that is heartless, emotionless pieces of metal and a human being. Humans have feelings, emotions and a sense of right and wrong or conscience. An example in the movie is the fact that a robot saved Del Spooner’s life because he had a higher percentage of surviving (45%) whereas the 12 year-old girl only had an 11% chance. Most humans would know that an 11% chance is enough to risk saving a young girl’s life. The idea of robots having no heart or soul was represented very well.
Another thing that I was impressed by was the way the humans talked about “old” technology that we consider fairly new in today’s culture such as using gasoline as fuel, cd players, remote controls and manual driving. The people became so reliant on robots and computers that their life was in a robot or automated system very frequently, and almost everything was controlled by voice or linked by a computer or mainframe of some sort. The casting of Will Smith for the role of Del Spooner was perfect because of his sarcastic and hero/good guy personality. His character was very easy to relate to especially when he puts on his “vintage” converse all stars from 2004. Since the movie was released in 2004, the technology has greatly improved even since this movie was written and produced. Of all the futuristic cultures I have seen in movies and television, I believe the writers and director did a great job of making the story believable and relatable. The special effects were very impressive for a 2004 film and gave off a realistic, futuristic vibe that I really enjoyed.
One thing that I did not think fit in very well to the movie was the comedic sayings and phrases by Will Smith. It seems very out of place and does not flow with the movie’s story line. I believe that the casting of Smith was not a bad choice, but they needed to tone down the focus on him and rather focus on the robots and how they were taking human jobs, which would give the impression that they were taking over the world. The beginning is a little too dramatic with the shower scene, but I did enjoy the whole “oldies” deal with the CD player. Also, a thing that bothered a lot of critics was the fact that it did not follow the original Asimov’s 9 original short stories that focused on how the 3 laws could be used to solve problems rather than trying to solve a problem with the 3 laws. The character played by Shia Labeouf was very annoying and seemed pointless to the story, which I feel took away from the movie. If they would have used the time they used for his scenes on something more towards the lines of robot’s jobs in the community, it would’ve made the situation seem more serious. Things like Shia’s character and Will’s random comedic moments make the movie seem very cheesy and over-done.
Overall, iRobot is a great watch. I highly enjoyed the special effects and the thinking it makes the viewers partake in. The CGI effects were very well done to simulate human-like qualities in the robot’s faces, actions and body movements. Without the cheesy comedy, pointless small-part character played by Shia, and the over-usage of Will Smith’s character, this movie would have been perfect. Every movie has its’ things that could have made it better, but I believe iRobot is a quality film worth watching multiple times. 

 Grant Ausbury